12.15.2006

May is no Rory

Elizabeth May is demanding that her Green Party be included in the next election's televised leaders debate, despite the fact that the Greens have never elected anyone to the House of Commons. While this page understands that some Canadians do support the Green Party, my respect for them as a political entity is withheld until they do the work of electing enough MPs to have official party status, rather than having that status handed to them because they held their collective breath and clicked their own web site until they turned blue.

It didn't escape my notice that former British Columbia Green Party leader Adrienne Carr stood beside May at yesterday's press conference/plea for attention, basking in her usual holier-than-thou smugness. Real progressives in BC had to put with four years of Carr's shenanigans, such as trespassing in the Speaker's corridor and assuming she could participate in Question Period without a seat in the Legislature. It didn't help that Carr was aided and abetted by a pliant pro-Liberal media corps determined to humiliate the New Democrats at every turn.

Asking people to vote online for official party status is another example of the Greens' disrespect for parliamentary tradition. In fact, Carr once argued that because the Greens received 10% of the popular vote in BC's 2001 election, they had to be included in the 2005 debates. How did the Federal Greens do back in January? 3.5%, which makes the Greens 6.5% less credible than they were last year. Strategically, they would have been better off focusing on a winnable riding or two and build the party over the next few elections. Instead, these organic anti-union right wingers, who think Corporate Canada will listen to reason on climate change, and wouldn't recognize poor people if they dropped dead in front of them, want it all, and want it right now.

Elizabeth May belongs in the Leaders Debate as much as Rory Fitzpatrick belongs in the NHL All-Star Game. At least Fitzpatrick is willing to play the rules and knows how to skate.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I completely agree, she sure ain't no Rory. Frankly, the whole Green meme is bloody annoying. It seems like their entire argument is "we should be allowed in the debates, because we should be allowed into the debates, because we should be allowed into the debates!" *holds breath and throws temper tantrum*.

Anyone who dares point out the things you did, ie: the obligation to actually win a seat is being 'un-democratic' all the sudden. We'll fine then folks, let's just let the Commies, Marxist-Lennists, Christian Heritage Party and any other group of people in - if they so desire. We wouldn't want to be 'un-democratic' now would we?

You know come to think of it, this is another, albeit political reason not to let the Greens into the debate. It makes them look silly, when all they do is complain about how unfair this is to them. Why talk about any issues, just talk about the 'injustice' of having to actually meet some standards that have been in existence since pretty much the begging of parliamentary democracy at the federal level of our country.

Anonymous said...

The Green Party earned 4.5% of the popular vote in the 2006 election, not 3.5% (and 5.3% in BC, even.)

Wasn't there a recent election in which the then-new-minted Conservative Party (as such) had never won a seat in the House and yet was included in the televised debate?